Nike has long been a global icon in the sneaker world, known for its style, performance, and innovation. As U.S. tariffs on imported goods rise, the brand may face tough decisions about how to balance rising production costs with consumer-friendly pricing.
Although Nike sells most of its products in America, almost all of its trainers are made in Asia. It is the region targeted by President Donald Trump’s tariff salvo against foreign countries he accused of “ripping off” Americans.
Furthermore, due to ongoing tariff tension, Nike’s share fell 14% after the tariff announcement. The shares fell due to fears over the impact they could have on the company’s supply chain.
A Brief Look at Nike’s Global Supply Chain
As of 2025, Nike’s global supply chain is under significant pressure due to newly imposed U.S. tariffs on imports from key manufacturing companies. Vietnam, a cornerstone of Nike’s production, accounts for around 50% of its footwear and 28% of its apparel manufacturing. Further, the recent imposition of 46% tariffs on Vietnamese goods by the United States has placed Nike’s supply chain under considerable strain.
China, another major hub for Nike, faces even steeper tariffs, with rates reaching up to 54% on imports. These tariffs have led to a surge in counterfeit products and unauthorized direct-to-consumer sales from Chinese manufacturers. Such a thing is generally seen in viral TikTok videos promoting cheaper alternatives.
Therefore, in response to the evolving trade landscape, Nike is exploring alternative manufacturing locations, including the Philippines. However, there are areas currently lacking robust infrastructure in Vietnam and China,
How Do Tariffs Directly Impact Production Costs?
Following the tariff announcement, Nike is grappling with significant challenges on imports from key manufacturing countries. As production costs rise due to tariffs, Nike is left with two options: either absorb the costs, which can erode profit margin, or pass them down to consumers at higher prices.
As the impact of tariffs is huge, especially the 46% rate on Vietnamese goods, it is more likely that consumers will face the blow of high prices. Thus, the 46% tariff on Vietnamese imports would increase Nike’s production cost, leading to higher retail prices.
Despite the challenges, Nike has not indicated any plans to shift production to the U.S., citing the high costs and time required to establish domestic manufacturing facilities. Economist Peter Schiff noted that Nike is unlikely to build factories in the U.S. due to the economic unviability posed by the 40% tariffs.
Amid these supply chain disruptions, Nike remains committed to sustainability. The company aims to source 50% of all key materials like polyester, cotton, leather, and rubber from environmentally preferred sources by the end of 2025. Additionally, Nike has achieved a 10% waste reduction per unit in manufacturing and distribution through improved designs and operational efficiency.
Will Nike Shift Production to Avoid Tariffs?
Nike is likely to shift production to avoid new tariffs announced by President Donald Trump. It is particularly because of new U.S. tariffs on Vietnam and other Asian countries that Nike is expected to diversify its supply chain by increasing production in countries like India. Nike will make this shift to other countries where labour costs are lower, and tariffs are more competitive.
Potential reasons for Nike to make such shifts are:
- Nike’s Current Situation: Nike heavily relies on factories in Vietnam and China for production, but these countries are now facing increased tariffs.
- The “China+1” Strategy: Nike is more prone to adopting a “China+1” approach, which means diversifying its supply chain beyond China to mitigate risks associated with tariffs and other trade tensions.
- India as an Alternative: India is emerging as a strong contender for Nike’s production. This is because India offers lower tariffs and competitive labour costs compared to Vietnam and other countries.
- Diversification Beyond Vietnam: Nike is also looking for other Asian countries like Indonesia and the Philippines to diversify its supply chain.
What a 25% Tariff Could Mean For Sneaker Prices?
Tariffs implemented are ranging from 10% to 25% on imported goods, significantly impacting the footwear industry. Given that around 97% of sneakers sold in the U.S. are imported, mainly from China, Vietnam, and Indonesia, these tariffs could lead to noticeable price increases for consumers.
1. Project Price Increases
Industry experts predict that sneaker prices could rise by 10% to 25% as a direct result of these tariffs. For example, a pair of Vietnamese-made running shoes retailing at $155 might increase to $220 soon.
2. Factors Contributing to Price Hikes
There are several factors contributing to these anticipated price increases:
- Tariff Rates: The U.S. has imposed tariffs of up to 54% on Chinese imports and 46% on Vietnamese goods, directly affecting the cost of imported sneakers.
- Limited Domestic Production: The U.S. lacks the infrastructure to produce sneakers at the scale and cost efficiency of Asian manufacturers. Thus, it is challenging to offset the impact of tariffs by shifting production domestically.
- Supply Chain Disruption: The sudden implementation of tariffs has disrupted the established supply chain, leading to increased costs in logistics and sourcing.
Furthermore, analysts predict that popular Nike models, like Air Jordan 1 High OG and Air Jordan 4 Retro, could see a price jump from $20 to $45, pushing the retail price to more than the $250 mark.
The increased costs are a result of the tariff being applied to the freight-on-board (FOB) price of the goods. For example, an Air Jordan 1 with a FOB price of $20 to $30 would incur an additional $9 to $14 per pair due to tariffs.
Conclusion
To sum up, rising U.S. tariffs are significantly impacting Nike’s production costs and supply chain strategies. As the company navigates shifting manufacturing hubs and trade tension, consumers might see a price jump on sneakers. Nike’s ability to adapt will be important in maintaining affordability and global competitiveness.
About The Author
